Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eitoku sugimori

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:32, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eitoku sugimori

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable, WP:BIO Skrelk (talk) 09:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BIO JayJay^{What did I do?} 16:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable Fails WP:BLP and WP:ARTIST --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 09:11, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Note that he is active in Japan mostly under the name すぎもりえいとく, though there are some sources that give 杉森永徳. Michitaro (talk) 19:58, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. That said, I can't find anything substantial in Japanese other than this article on him by the city hall of his hometown. Everything else in English and Japanese seems to be just gallery profiles or catalog listings of his book. Fails WP:ARTIST. Michitaro (talk) 20:04, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even if there were sources in Japanese, due to WP:Verifiable the article would only be suitable for the Japanese Wikipedia. Seeing that no sources seem to exist in general it does not meet WP:BLP. Mkdw ^talk 21:47, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just a point of information, but WP:VERIFIABLE in no way excludes foreign language sources from the English Wikipedia (see WP:NONENG). Japanese language sources are just as relevant for determining notability here as on the Japanese Wikipedia. Of the dozens of Japan-related AfDs I have participated in, Japanese sources have been used constantly. The problem with this article is that it is a Japan-related subject with not even enough Japanese sources to prove notability. Michitaro (talk) 17:25, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:12, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:12, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:12, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.